Skip to main content

Cilley v. Todd: trial notes, three volumes and one partial transcript

 File — Box: 3, Folder: 17
Identifier: 354.3

Scope and Contents

From the Series:

This series contains materials related to the legal and political work of Jonathan Cilley. There are documents related to three legal cases in which Jonathan Cilley was involved. In Cilley v. Todd, Cilley accused Todd of libelous statements printed in the Eastern Argus newspaper. In Estate of Jonathan Cilley v. John Ruggles, John Ruggles brought a suit against Cilley’s estate after his death claiming that Cilley owed him money. McCobb v. Watts concerned fee payment for the vessel Catharine on the island of Monhegan. The three legal cases are particularly notable in their overlap of participants: McCobb, Ruggles, and Hezekiah Prince. The series also includes a small amount of material related to Cilley's time in the state and national legislature, especially draft speeches.

Dates

  • Creation: ca. 1820s-ca. 1830s

Creator

Extent

From the Series: .25 Linear Feet

Language of Materials

From the Collection: English

Physical Storage Information

Repository Details

Repository Details

Part of the George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine 04011 Repository

http://library.bowdoin.edu/arch/index.shtml
Contact:
3000 College Station
Brunswick Maine 04011 USA
(207) 725-3288

Acknowledgment of non-neutrality

The George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, like all archives and special collections libraries, is the creation of human beings who have collected, organized, and described things in ways that reflect personal, cultural, societal, and institutional biases. Although we strive to preserve and present collections in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections, we acknowledge that our systems are neither neutral nor perfect. We encourage you to let us know if you encounter materials, descriptive language, or practices that are offensive or harmful, particularly those for which inadequate context or warning is offered. We are committed to modifying and updating our descriptive practices to use respectful and inclusive terminology and appreciate your help in this work. We look forward to supporting you in your research and learning together.