Skip to main content

Indictment/North, Poindexter, Secord, Hakim

 File — offsite-box: 347
Identifier: M202.6.2.16.1

Scope and Contents

From the Sub-Series:

Subject files date from 1986 through 1987 and contain information relating to the procedural and informational aspects of the investigation: agendas, questions, testimony, correspondence, memos, and press information. Files also contain background information: research notes and reports, laws, rulings, briefs, and statements. There are files on Lt. Col. North, Retired Air Force General Richard Secord, Admiral John Poindexter, John Neilds, and Manucher Ghorbanifar. Files include a letter from Archibald Cox, the Watergate special prosecutor, urging the committee to refrain from granting immunity to witnesses. These files were maintained by Richard Arenberg.

Arranged alphabetically by subject.

Dates

  • Creation: 1948 - 2023

Creator

Conditions Governing Access

Restricted until January 3, 2015.

Extent

From the Sub-Series: 7 Linear Feet

Language of Materials

From the Collection: Undetermined

Physical Storage Information

Repository Details

Repository Details

Part of the George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, Bowdoin College Library, Brunswick, Maine 04011 Repository

http://library.bowdoin.edu/arch/index.shtml
Contact:
3000 College Station
Brunswick Maine 04011 USA
(207) 725-3288

Acknowledgment of non-neutrality

The George J. Mitchell Department of Special Collections & Archives, like all archives and special collections libraries, is the creation of human beings who have collected, organized, and described things in ways that reflect personal, cultural, societal, and institutional biases. Although we strive to preserve and present collections in a manner that is respectful to the individuals and communities who create, use, and are represented in the collections, we acknowledge that our systems are neither neutral nor perfect. We encourage you to let us know if you encounter materials, descriptive language, or practices that are offensive or harmful, particularly those for which inadequate context or warning is offered. We are committed to modifying and updating our descriptive practices to use respectful and inclusive terminology and appreciate your help in this work. We look forward to supporting you in your research and learning together.